"Ian Rankin once explained to an interviewer (the head of the Indian Communist Party!) that crime fiction is a way of talking about social inequality. Ron Jacobs applies that same maxim to the Sixties... in his wonderfully noir trilogy of those exhilarating and troubled times. And what Rankin does for Edinburgh, Jacobs amply illuminates for the Movement. Much much more than ripping yarns (though they are that too), from a master who's been there, done that, and lived to tell a tale or two."
Friday, March 27, 2015
Friday, March 20, 2015
Friday, March 13, 2015
Friday, March 6, 2015
A US War Resister in Germany: A Matter of Conscience
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/06/a-us-war-resister-in-germany/
a slight correction...Since the piece began with Andre thanking you for "a forum in which I can provide factual information on the case," I thought it might be helpful to correct some of the mis portrayal of who qualifies as a CO.
Andre is right that the person needs to be opposed to any war they can imagine themselves fighting in. (It is not a requirement that the person state whether they accept or reject the war that gave birth to the US.) Someone who says they would fight in certain wars probably would be turned down.
Religious basis is not a separate way to get out. No matter what religion the person still must be opposed to participation in all war. Also, a person need not be religious at all as long as the moral principles that direct their life are comparable in strength to those held by religious people. We deal with many atheist and agnostic applicants who still get out for CO.
The third issue is sincerity. A person's lifestyle can help indicate their sincerity. Giving up paintball and combat video games can indicate sincerity of a conscientious objector but a person does not have to give up these things. I have worked with legitimate, sincere conscientious objectors who still bow hunt and nevertheless were discharged. (There is more than one way to show sincerity).
I realize that for Andre conscientious objection didn't feel right and that is fine. I just want to be careful that others who might well qualify don't mistakenly believe themselves ineligible because of Andre's mis characterization of the actual definition. Anyone who even wonders whether they qualify can call the GI Rights Hotline 877-447-4487 to explore whether or not conscientious objection might be the right fit for them. People who are having issues with the military often go online to learn about others with similar beliefs. For others reading this interview with Andre it may be helpful to include a note of clarification so as not to unnecessarily limit the pool of future Conscientious Objection applicants.
Peace,
Steve W.
a slight correction...Since the piece began with Andre thanking you for "a forum in which I can provide factual information on the case," I thought it might be helpful to correct some of the mis portrayal of who qualifies as a CO.
Andre is right that the person needs to be opposed to any war they can imagine themselves fighting in. (It is not a requirement that the person state whether they accept or reject the war that gave birth to the US.) Someone who says they would fight in certain wars probably would be turned down.
Religious basis is not a separate way to get out. No matter what religion the person still must be opposed to participation in all war. Also, a person need not be religious at all as long as the moral principles that direct their life are comparable in strength to those held by religious people. We deal with many atheist and agnostic applicants who still get out for CO.
The third issue is sincerity. A person's lifestyle can help indicate their sincerity. Giving up paintball and combat video games can indicate sincerity of a conscientious objector but a person does not have to give up these things. I have worked with legitimate, sincere conscientious objectors who still bow hunt and nevertheless were discharged. (There is more than one way to show sincerity).
I realize that for Andre conscientious objection didn't feel right and that is fine. I just want to be careful that others who might well qualify don't mistakenly believe themselves ineligible because of Andre's mis characterization of the actual definition. Anyone who even wonders whether they qualify can call the GI Rights Hotline 877-447-4487 to explore whether or not conscientious objection might be the right fit for them. People who are having issues with the military often go online to learn about others with similar beliefs. For others reading this interview with Andre it may be helpful to include a note of clarification so as not to unnecessarily limit the pool of future Conscientious Objection applicants.
Peace,
Steve W.
Friday, February 27, 2015
Friday, February 20, 2015
Friday, February 13, 2015
Creating a Crisis--It's NATO's Way
Labels:
Counterpunch,
economics,
Germany,
imperialism,
military,
NATO,
Russia,
truce,
Ukraine,
war,
war machine
Friday, February 6, 2015
Friday, January 30, 2015
Friday, January 23, 2015
Friday, January 16, 2015
Monday, January 12, 2015
Idiocy in the Name of God: The Heresy of Religion
Labels:
Catholicism,
Counterpunch,
culture,
heresy,
imperialism,
Islam,
Israel,
Judaism,
religion,
violence,
war
Friday, January 9, 2015
Friday, January 2, 2015
Friday, December 26, 2014
The Sense of Disconnection is Unreal
Originally appeared in Torture:Asian and Global Perspectives
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/26/the-sense-of-disconnection-is-unreal/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/26/the-sense-of-disconnection-is-unreal/
Monday, December 22, 2014
It's Not a War on Cops in NYC
The first sentence should read...who allegedly SHOT...."
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/22/its-not-a-war-on-cops-in-nyc/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/22/its-not-a-war-on-cops-in-nyc/
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Friday, December 19, 2014
Friday, December 12, 2014
Friday, December 5, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)